If you’re seeking out a severe gaming images card, look somewhere else — reviewers in reality dragged the AMD 199 Radeon RX 6500 XT in January, and today’s GPU entry is even weaker. But in case you in reality positively need to shape a miniature photos card in a totally small PC, the brand new RX 6400 is probably worth a look.
Nowadays, AMD has quietly launched the Radeon RX 6400 with an array of companions together with ASRock, Biostar, Gigabyte, MSI, PowerColor, Sapphire, and XFX, and we’re in reality seeing some of them retail for that charge or close to it, GPU shortage be damned. There’s a $159.99 ASRock Challenger and a $169.99 XFX Speedster SWFT105 in stock at Newegg right now with a $159.99 Sapphire Pulse card also coming.
As a quick primer, the RX 6400 is based on the Navi 24 GPU, has 764 circulate Processors, a base clock of 1923MHz, a sports clock of 2039MHz, and a boost clock of 2321MHz. Additionally, the 6400 has 4GB of GDDR6 graphics memory, unfold across a 64-bit memory bus.
AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT and RX 6400 RDNA-2 based 6nm GPUs with 4GB DDR6 memory announced
On the other side, the card will not be available in a reference design, making it clear that AMD is leaving the cooling answers to its AIB partners. For that count, it doesn’t appear that the card has an external PCIe strength connector, indicating that the RX 6400 will draw energy from the PCIe slot when plugged in.
Intriguingly, every one of these cards seems to be a miniature model, and many of them are single-slot, low-profile GPUs that could match in much narrower instances.
Mind you, there’s a reason those cards don’t want to be big! They’re best rated at 53W of power, much less than half the power of even the lackluster RX 6500 XT, with the most efficient 12 compute devices (down from 16), lower clocks, slower RAM, best 128GB in keeping with 2d of bandwidth, and display outputs. On the plus aspect, you don’t need an extra power connector: the cardboard can draw all its power from the PCI-express slot.